Homepage
Search site
News Updates Thu., January 27, 2005 Shvat 17, 5765 Israel Time:  02:18  (GMT+2)
Print Edition
News
Business
Editorial & Op-Ed
Features
Sports
Art & Leisure
Books
Letters
Food & Wine
Tourism
Real Estate
Cartoon
Friday Magazine
Week's End
Anglo File
W. Bank fence ruling
Disengagement plan
Shopping service
Previous Editions
This Day in Haaretz
Today`s Papers
Map of Israel
Useful Numbers
In-depth
About Haaretz
Tech Support
Paper in PDF format
Headline Newsbox
Arab kids aren't a joy
By Ruth Sinai

Senior treasury officials, some say the finance minister himself, were anonymously proud this week that the cut in child allowances not only saved a lot of money, but also, they said, caused a 3.4 percent decline in the birthrate among Israeli Arab citizens. The treasury was more modest about another of its accomplishments: in 2003, the year in which the cutbacks in the child allowances went into effect, the number of poor children in Israel rose by 31 percent.

Israel leads the Western world in the number of poor children. The last two years have been among the worst those children and their parents have known. If indeed there was a decline in the birthrate in 2004 - and the data is still lacking on that score, despite the bragging in the treasury - it's no wonder that there was.

After six years of stability, there was a significant rise in 2003 in the number of poor families. Not only were their child allowances cut, so were their guaranteed income allowances, aid for housing rent and discounts they had for city taxes. If the growth in unemployment and the increased costs of health care and education are added to the mix, clearly there were couples who decided to postpone planned children or even marriage.

Thomas Malthus's theory of demography, which anticipated in 1798 that if the world's population continued to grow there would not be enough resources to feed it, has found new disciples in the treasury building. Malthus also believed that helping the poor encourages them to dangerously reproduce. But in the 200 years that have passed since then, there has yet to be any discovery of scientific evidence that starving and punishing the poor causes them to have fewer children. The only country in the modern world that used punishments to limit births - China - has not enjoyed dazzling success with it. The number of children in the cities has declined, but in the rural areas it is still 2.5 per couple.

The fertility rates of Jews and Arabs have both been in constant decline for years in Israel, irrespective of the socioeconomic experiments the government has been conducting on people in the last two years. The decline is the result of social, cultural and economic factors: a rise in women's education, their integration in the workplace, privatization of educational and health services that make the expenses incurred by children more expensive, and other factors. A similar process is taking place throughout Western society.

In trying to halt the shrinking population, Western governments are looking at various instruments to encourage people to have children. In Italy, where the fertility rate is now the lowest in the West, they encourage people to do their patriotic duty and have children, going so far as to pay a bonus worth NIS 5,000 to a couple that brings a second child into the world.

It is too soon to know what effect such efforts will have. So far, the research shows that the connection between economic incentives and increased childbirth rates is at most marginal. A study done last year by Ronni Frisch from the Bank of Israel showed that fertility rates have remained the same among Druze and Bedouin since 1986, even though some received significantly more money in the form of child allowances starting in the mid-1990s, when the discrimination against them compared to army veterans was dropped.

If the treasury really wants to improve conditions for the weaker populations, as it claims, and thinks that direct aid to families keeps them unemployed and having babies they cannot support, it should take the money it "saved" by cutting allotments and give it to those families in the form of educational, health and welfare services.

The director general of the National Insurance Institute, Yigal Ben Shalom, has been pressing the finance minister for months to do so, but the cynical and demagogic behavior of Benjamin Netanyahu and his staffers proves that is not their intention. They are proud that they "healed" the economy and sent "the parasites" to work. And into the ears of the political patron of the ultra-Orthodox parasites they whisper that the cost of the cutbacks was worth it, because it reduces the number of Arabs, and everyone knows that Arab children are no joy.


Top Articles
Beating Thatcher at her own game
Adding to the slew of positive macroeconomic indicators in the past month were unemployment figures.
By Ami Ginsburg
A case of bad timing
Manpower Branch Commander Maj. Gen. Elazar Stern is a great generator of scandals; every few months he manages to set off another one.
By Amos Harel
Special Offers
Advertisement
Study in Israel
Study for your B.A. in Israel in English. Scholarships available.
Haaretz International
Weekly Digital Edition - Direct to your computer in seconds. Go >>
Shopping Service
New for Haaretz readers -- top Israeli brands on one site. Go >>
Help Israeli soldiers
Help our soldiers get home safely this Shabbat. >>
Home | News | Business | Editorial & Op-Ed | Features | Sports | Books | Cartoon | Site rules |
© Copyright   Haaretz. All rights reserved